| 008 |
|
240414s2021 xx obm 000 0 eng d |
| 020 |
|
|a9798352651377
|
| 035 |
|
|a(MiAaPQ)AAI29409780
|
| 035 |
|
|a(MiAaPQ)AustNatlU1885268660
|
| 040 |
|
|aMiAaPQ|beng|cMiAaPQ|dNTU
|
| 100 |
1
|
|aLangridge, Emma Michelle.
|
| 245 |
10
|
|aMargin for Error :|bRules-Based Systems of Painting and the Anticipation of Irregular Outcomes.
|
| 264 |
0
|
|c2021
|
| 300 |
|
|a1 online resource (193 pages)
|
| 336 |
|
|atext|btxt|2rdacontent
|
| 337 |
|
|acomputer|bc|2rdamedia
|
| 338 |
|
|aonline resource|bcr|2rdacarrier
|
| 500 |
|
|aSource: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 84-04, Section: A.
|
| 500 |
|
|aAdvisor: Brooke, Julie.
|
| 502 |
|
|aThesis (Ph.D.)--The Australian National University (Australia), 2021.
|
| 504 |
|
|aIncludes bibliographical references
|
| 520 |
|
|aMy practice-led research explores modes of painting where restrictions on materials and methods generate unpredictable outcomes. I focus on non-objective, processed-based painting, employing rigorous and repetitive methodologies which, I will argue, are essentially a form of machine-mimicry. When the machine encounters a disrupting element, the task continues unabated, forming a glitch.This idea developed from an interrogation of my own art practice, in which a highly disciplined approach paradoxically precipitates the unpredictable bleed of paint, misalignments and inaccuracies. This has led me to explore self-imposed limitations and highly restricted visual vocabulary on the one hand, and the phenomena of glitch and malfunction on the other.I conduct an examination of motives, processes and materials in my own practice, determining the conditions which facilitate glitch and the particular form in which it is manifested. I focus on the history of glitch and malfunction in sound-related media, proposing that glitch can occur in the plastic arts under certain conditions created by the artist. I draw on the work of Sol Lewitt and Jack Whitten, as well as my contemporaries, in order to relate this tendency to a broader trend which confronts and ultimately embraces the aesthetics of decay, entropy, fracture and rupture.Initially I ask, what is glitch in non-objective, process-based painting and what criteria would need to be met for such a description? Coming to suspect that glitch may be an aesthetic dead-end, I develop tactics for development and expansion, via visual splits and ruptures, whilst maintaining my rules-based practice.
|
| 533 |
|
|aElectronic reproduction.|bAnn Arbor, Mich. :|cProQuest,|d2024
|
| 538 |
|
|aMode of access: World Wide Web
|
| 650 |
4
|
|aArtists.
|
| 650 |
4
|
|aPhotographs.
|
| 650 |
4
|
|aDrawing.
|
| 650 |
4
|
|aDesign.
|
| 650 |
4
|
|aFine arts.
|
| 650 |
4
|
|aAesthetics.
|
| 655 |
7
|
|aElectronic books.|2local
|
| 690 |
|
|a0389
|
| 690 |
|
|a0357
|
| 690 |
|
|a0650
|
| 710 |
2
|
|aProQuest Information and Learning Co.
|
| 710 |
2
|
|aThe Australian National University (Australia).
|
| 773 |
0
|
|tDissertations Abstracts International|g84-04A.
|
| 856 |
40
|
|uhttp://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=29409780|zclick for full text (PQDT)
|